Ostrom and O’Regan Granular Enough? (re: Proposals For Budget Reductions) // Sheila Taylor
In their March 7 post, Ostrom and O’Regan called for a granular look at the proposed budget, then made a cost-saving proposal of their own. I appreciate the considerable work they have done, respect their intentions, and presume many of their suggestions are worth considering (though I suspect that even taken together, they would not fill the financial gap our city faces). I have a problem with their proposal, however, because they misunderstand how the library is funded.
At one time, the city budget included … Read more →